EMAIL ON DEOBANDI AQEEDAH

FIRST EMAIL IS A REPLY TO THE EMAIL BELOW WHICH CONSISTED OF
SEVERAL OBJECTIONS TO ULAMA OF DEOBAND & SAUDI ARABIA

 

From :  Darul Ifta - Camperdown <alinaam@yebo.co.za>
Sent :  Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:37 AM
To :  "'Mujtaba Ali'" <maktbaithanvi@hotmail.com>
Subject :  RE: Question "Deobandi Aqeedah"
Go to previous message | Go to next message | Delete | Fatawa | Inbox

At the outset, before answering the objections that you have raised, we wish to inform you that just as there is a vast difference between Islam and Muslims, likewise there is a great difference between Tabligh Jamaat and its workers. Islam is the true and perfect religion undoubtedly, but not every Muslims portrays it the way he suppose to do so. Likewise, with Tabligh. We do not deny some of the objections you have raised (unless they are false). Every single human being is bound to make mistakes. Therefore, understand well, the fact that there are definitely shortcomings and mistakes amongst those who participate in Tabligh (like there is in all other efforts of Deen), this does not in any way whatsoever degrade the actual work of Tabligh itself, neither does it render one excusable from it. If, in a certain town, there are 10 wholesalers all of whom are involved in cheating, deception and fraud, this has no impact at all on the actual work of wholesaling. Likewise, if there are shortcomings in some of the workers of Tabligh, this cannot have any impact on the work of Tabligh. The work of Tabligh will still remain Haqq. Yes, it will be upon the various individuals to take care of their mistakes and shortcomings.

After understanding the above, we will now answer your queries:

1.      It seems as though you are referring to the Salafis or may be some people who are inclined towards Salafism. The aim and object of Tabligh is to make such an effort by virtue of which 100% Deen becomes a reality into the lives of the whole of mankind. Everything else is secondary, not to say unimportant. You say that some of them do not adopt the Aqeedah of Ahlus sunnah Wal Jamaah. The problem is that everyone claims to be following the Ahlus sunnah Wal Jamaah. Everyone looks at it in their own way and claims that they are right. What is the true interpretation of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah is a discussion on its own, suffice to say here that the workers of Tabligh have an aim and an objective which they strive towards.

2.      When you say ‘Shar’ee knowledge’, we assume you refer to knowledge of Deen in general over and above the knowledge of the basic fundamentals. It is compulsory on every believer to seek that amount of knowledge by virtue of which he will be able to fulfil the commandments of Allah Ta’ala. Any form of knowledge over and above this is meritorious, not compulsory. As mentioned earlier, participants of Tabligh have a mission ahead of them which is far more important than seeking extra knowledge. Nevertheless, they also concentrate heavily on 6 points, one of which is knowledge and rememberance of Allah Ta’ala. Therefore, we can safely say that it is part and parcel of their activities to acquire as much knowledge as they can.

3.      This claim is incorrect. The interpretation of verses of the Qur’aan regarding Jihaad to mean going out to give Da’awah is a correct interpretation. You need to understand a simple principle of Tafseer. Verses of the Qur’aan do not only refer specifically to what it seems like outwardly, but instead they extend a general meaning in many cases.

In the case of Jihaad, the word Jihaad literally means to strive, make an effort, sacrifice, etc. It, thus, includes every form of worship for which one has to make an effort. There are numerous Ahaadith of Nabi (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) which bear testimony to this. In fact, there are so many verses of the Qur’aan which contain the word ‘Jihad’, yet these verses were revealed before Hijrat and before Hijrat, there was no physical Jihaad (fighting) – what will those verses then refer to? Similarly, the word ‘Fee Sabeelillah’ does not only refer specifically to Jihaad. There are numerous Ahaadith which clearly prove that these words also refer to various other actions. Imaam Bukhari (RA) has brought the following narration under the discussion of Jumu’ah Salaat: ‘Abaaya ibn Rifaa’ah says that Hadhrat Abu Abs Badri (RA) met me whilst I was walking towards the Musjid for Jumu’ah Salaat. He said that he had heard Nabi (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) saying the person whose feet gets covered with dust whilst he is in the path of Allah, Allah Ta’ala will make him Haraam from the fire of Jahannum. (Bukhari vol.1 pg.124; Qadeemi).

In this Hadith, ‘Fee Sabeelillah’ includes walking towards the Musjid for Jumu’ah Salaat. Likewise, various other Ahaadith prove that both words ‘Jihaad’ and ‘Fee sabeelillah’ include numerous other actions besides physical fighting in the battlefield. Nevertheless, we are unaware of how well versed you are, since this is an academic discussion, the proofs and details of which you may not understand. However, should you still feel unsatisfied, kindly contact us again on this specific query.

4.      ‘The taste of the pudding is in eating it.’ Since you have not spent sufficient time yourself in this great work, merely ‘on-looking’ has given you the wrong impression. Nobody claims that the system of going out for specific days (40 days, 4 months, etc.) is proven from the Qur’aan. This 40 days or any other number of specific time is merely a training period. The object is not 40 days but the object is that this is a ‘lifetime effort’. In order to bring this understanding into the heart and mind, it requires gradual sacrifice on a regular basis. Nobody says that this is from the Qur’aan. It is only a training period which was established to accommodate for everyone. We are not saying that the number of specific days is the objective. The actions that are carried out during this time is the objective. Now, in order to make these actions part and parcel of our daily life, a gradual but regular effort is required. Hence, this period of 40 days or 4 months was stipulated to accommodate everyone, so as to make this gradual effort by virtue of which the actions carried out therein will become habitual and second nature. And if any particular person wishes to for a shorter period, he is also accommodated.

5.      We cannot understand what is ‘against the Shari’ah’, if somebody is appointed to make Du’aa. Undoubtedly, Allah Ta’ala is most merciful and he may accept the Du’aas of anybody, even an open sinner but it is the system (Sunnat) of Allah Ta’ala, that the Du’aa of one who is sincere has much more effect. So what is wrong with this?

6.      As mentioned earlier on, this too is an objection on a small percentage of the participants and not on the actual work of Tabligh. Firstly, how ‘widespread’ has this become? Alhamdulillah, Tabligh has reached every corner of the world. It will be foolish to claim that this allegation has become rife all over the world, wherever the workers are. Hence, we see that this is only a small fraction. Secondly, the demands of Tabligh is that the general masses refrain from quoting verses of the Qur’aan and Hadith. Now, when learned people like yourself act as onlookers and criticise, then what else do we expect? All this is besides the point that academically speaking there is nothing wrong with quoting weak narrations for Fadhaail (virtues) if its conditions are fulfilled. As far as fabricated narrations are concerned, then these are very rare, thus you have to be more specific as to which narrations you are referring to. Nevertheless, Tabligh is still and will always be Haqq. If there are faults and shortcomings, then this is because of the workers and participants. The actions of the workers cannot render one excusable from the actual work.

7.      This is a false allegation. You have failed to understand what exactly ‘Nahy anil munkar; refers to. The workers are doing both enjoining the good and forbidding the evil. However, the manner in which forbidding evil is being accomplished is something that you need to understand. ‘Forbidding evil’ has got nothing to do with force, severity, scolding, hitting, shouting or weapons and ammunitions as you or others may assume. We will cite just one incident by way of example which will clear up your mind.

The famous incident of the villager who urinated in one corner of Masjid-un-Nabawiy. Look at the severity of the sin! Firstly, urinating inside the Musjid and then on top of that, in front of Nabi (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). Now, this was the evil. How was it prevented? Did Nabi (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) lift up his sword? Did he roll up his sleeves? What did he do? He kindly and most lovingly explained to this villager the importance of respecting the sanctity of the Musjid. This is it. Outwardly, this seems to be only enjoining good and not forbidding evil, but in reality, it entails both. Hence, the worker of Tabligh may outwardly seem to be neglecting ‘forbidding evil’ but in reality, they are using wisdom and foresight in their efforts. In fact, we suggest that you refer to the book, ‘Al-Rasoolul mu’allim wa asaalibuhu fiy ta’leem’ of Shaykh Abdul-Fattaah Abu-Ghuddah for a clear insight of the various methods applied by Rasulullah (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) in forbidding evil.

8.      If your brother is performing Salaat out of pride and for show, will you then stop performing Salaat or will you criticise the action of Salaat because of his evil doing? Then why do you criticise the work of Tabligh just because some brothers of yours in other parts of the world have pride and arrogance? Your objection (as is always being repeated here) is on the workers and not on the work. Leave the workers alone and worry about doing the work. Why only Tableegh? What about all the other Muslims who are not doing Tabligh and are involved in some other effort of Deen, yet they may also have pride, arrogance and look down on others? Have they already become Jannatis and all the criticism of pride, showing off and self-admiration just landed on the heads of the workers of Tabligh?

9.      This and all other objections are purely based on misunderstanding. There is a difference between a spectator and a physical participant! If you physically take part in this great effort then you will understand it better. You claim that ‘they regard going out for Da’awah as better than Jihaad and knowledge’. Tabligh doesn’t deny any other effort or form of worship like Jihaad. Nobody denied, criticised or trounced upon Jihaad? As for knowledge, this aspect was well explained previously under 2

10.  Part of this has been covered under 6. The workers of Tabligh are commanded to remain within the circle of their famous 6 points. They are not allowed to speak about anything beyond these 6 points, neither are they allowed to interpret or quote verses of the Qur’aan and Hadith. Now, if some of the workers neglect this order then this is ‘their fault’. It is not the fault of the work itself. What is more disturbing is this that people who have the knowledge and understanding of the Qur’aan, Hadith and the rulings, etc. merely sit back and criticise. If the workers of Tabligh continue to issues Fatwas, discuss Tafseer and Hadith and issue rulings (as you claim), if they do this from now till Qiyaamat and you sit, watch and criticise, then their shortcoming is understood, but what good did you do? In fact, you will be more responsible for knowing about it but doing nothing. Brother, take to our humble advice and become part and parcel of this noble work. It will benefit you and many others will benefit from you.

11.  Once again, you find fault in the workers of Tabligh. What wrong have they done? Why is it that everytime, only and only the Tablighi’s are at fault? What about the thousands of Muslim businessmen throughout the world who travel alone for weeks on end to Hong Kong,London, Brazil and Germany for business purposes? Are they not neglecting the rights of their wives and children?  What about the thousands of Muslim men that go alone for Hajj every year without fail and stay there for weeks on end? Do they not have wives and children? Have all these people, all of a sudden become ‘angels’ and it is only and only the workers of Tabligh who are to be blamed all the time? Nevertheless, the answer given in reply to q3043 merely expounds the importance of looking after all the necessary requirements for the wife and children. This answer does not at all deal directly with nor does it degrade or criticise Tabligh. Coming back to the point, the workers of Tabligh are well aware of the rights of their family members. If it is genuinely and authentically proven (not just a mere assumption) that certain workers of Tabligh are neglecting the Shar’ee rights of their family, then as we always say, this is their fault and not the fault of the actual work of Tabligh. In this case, a mere ‘look’ or ‘criticism’ from the outside will never solve the problem, instead, it will need courage for us all to join the effort and work from within the inside with kindness and wisdom. In fact, even this issue can be said to be well-covered by the work of Tabligh, since one of the famous 6 points is called Ikraamul Muslim. This includes discharging of rights due to others, be it one’s wife, children, relatives, neighbours or anyone else. Hence, Tabligh teaches a person to justly and correctly discharge every right that he is bound to.

Finally, to further support your criticism, you have sought refuge in the Fatwas of Shaykh ibn Baaz and Sheykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (RA). It suffices for us here to say that every person will issue a verdict according to his personal understanding of the relevant issue, depending on who informed him, but remember if one is not personally and physically involved and participating in Tablidh, he will never understand it. Did any of these two Shaykhs physically participate in Tabligh or did they merely pass their verdicts according to the information that they ‘heard’ about this effort? We respect them for their knowledge and piety. However, we disagree with their view simply because the reality on the ground is totally different from that which was falsely explained to them.

Lastly, we humbly advise you to look at this great and noble effort with a different eye. If you will continue to look for faults, then most definitely you will find them, but how will that benefit you? Look at the thousands of people throughout the world who have brought revolutions to their lives by joining this effort. We request you to physically join this effort and realise that the proper understanding of Tabligh will only enter your heart after spending maximum time in this effort.

Faculty of Specialty in Hadith Sciences

============================================
** Zakaat, Lillah - Donations; Sales, etc.
******** Donate to the Madrasah for Sadaqatul Jaariyah ***********
** www.alinaam.org.za/dappeal.htm **

Madrasah In'aamiyyah, Camperdown
P.O. Box 39, Camperdown
3720, KZN, South Africa

email: alinaam@alinaam.org.za
Tel.: 0027-31-7851239
Cell/Mobile: 0027-83-7107867
Fax: 0027-31-7852786

[ Darul Ifta open 10:30 am. - 1:00 pm SA Time]
________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: Mujtaba Ali [mailto:maktbaithanvi@hotmail.com]
Sent: 02 July 2003 05:47
To: webmaster@islam.tc; ulama@islamsa.org.za; Questions@albalagh.net; fatwa@seerat.net; mufti@telkomsa.net; mufti@channelislam.com; direct@direct.za.org; mohtamim@darululoom-deoband.com; mohdtaqi@cyber.net.pk; fatwa@binoria.org; duloom@tstt.net.tt; darulum@eastcoast.co.za; binoria@binoria.org; alinaam@alinaam.org.za; alinaam@yebo.co.za
Subject: Question "Deobandi Aqeedah"



>From: "Humayun Shawl"
>Reply-To: "Humayun Shawl"
>To: maktbaithanvi@hotmail.com
>Subject: Request
>Date: 26 Jun 2003 16:23:38 -0000
>
>
>As-salaam-u-alikum-wa-Rahmat-ullaahi-wa-Barakaatu.
> Respected Ulema-e-Kiraam,
>
> I, Dr. Humayun Shawl R/o Srinagar, Kashmir, want your reply to the questions. Which I will Inshallah list below.
>
> I also wish to get the detailed answers signed by Mufti Aazam of Saudia and leading Hanafee Scholars in Saudia. So that nobody here would say that this is the opinion of WAHHABIYAH.
>
> The questions are:-
>
> 1. What is your opinion about the concept of Wahdat-ul-Wajood (Pantheism) and Wahdat-us-Shuhiid? What about the concept of Ghous/Qutb & Abdaal in Sainthood e.g Some people say that Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jeelaanee (RA) of Baghdad eas Ghous-ul-Aazam (meaning greatest helper). These beliefs are propogated by Sufis & Deobandis.
>
> 2. What about Deobandi Ulemas’s reverence of their Sufis e.g. Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi, Qasim Nanotvi and Maulana Zakariya the writer of Fazaail-e-Aamaal and Imdaadullah Muhajir Makki. Some scholars of Madina University e.g. Mehraj-ud-deen-Rabbaani say they were Mushriks (Polytheists) for their beliefs of (Panthesim) Wahdat-ul- Wajood as well as Ghous, Qutb and Abdaal. What is the right opinion about them? If they are Polythists, then can we distance ourselves from people who hold same beliefs and also revere them highly? Can we boycott them totally in accordance to the order of Quran?
>
> 3. What is your opinion about the University of Deoband? Their teaching of Hadees. I mean they don’t differentiate between Saheeh, Daeef and Mawdoo Ahaadees. What about their Aquaids./beliefs. ? They do not even follow Imaam Abu Haneefa (RA) in Aqaaid which is very very surprising to me. Please answer in detail. If possible send a book on this topic. Please.
>
> 4. What about Fazaail-e-Aamaal ? Is this book filled / Studded with fabricated and weak Hadees and some scholars of Madina University have severely criticized this book. Please
>
>comment.
>
> 5. Deobandi literature is filled miracles of Deobandi saints & Sufis. This ultimately leads to saint worship as is seen in many followers of Deoband or anybody who reads Deobandi literature. Please comment.
>
>6. Deobandi concept of Wujub of Taqleed (Blindly following ones Mazhab). They say one who leaves taqleed destroys his Emaam. Consequently they give bad names to the Salafis. Like Ghair-Muqallideen or Shias for their preference of Saheeh over Daeef Ahadees. I have myself read these bad names and other “hate-literature” of the Deobandis. Deobandis say that Salafis (or Ahl-e-Hadees) are dirty. Irreligious people. Please comment.
>
> 7. Deobandi concept of Sheikh and disciple (Peer-o-Murshid). Their concept of Biat or Pledge given to a Sheikh. Please comment in detail on this controversial topic.
>
>8. Unbeleivable things are written in the Deobandi literature e.g. one of their Saints coming out of his grave after years of his death and the advising the ulema of Deoband. Please Comment.
>
> 9. Deobandis consider Ibn-e-Arabee as Shaykh-as-Akbar were as others say he was a Polytheist an Innovater. Please comment.This grave sin of Shirk and Bidah is very very common in the Indian subcontinent. Even Scholars are no exception. Sheikh-ul-Islam Ibn-Taymiyah (RA) has given a fatwa of death sentence for a person holding the beliefs of Ghous. Qutb and Abdaal & other Pantheistic views. Please comment.
>
> 10. Can a Sheikh order his disciple to recite his Kalimah instead of the Kalimah-e-Shahaadat e.g. Laa-i-laaha-illallaah Thanwi Rasool-lallaah (Naouzubillah) ? Plz comment.
>
> 11. Faazil of Madina University Fazeelatush Shiekh Mehraj Rabbanis’ Takfeer of Deobandi Ulema. His saying that they are Polythists and Pantheists.Plz comment.
>
> 12. Can a Saint after standing near the grave of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) in Masjid-e-Nabwi shake his hand, with the Prophets hands. This is written in Deobandi literature ? Plz Comment.
>
> 13. Why Saudia Govt. stopped the Printing of Tafseer of Maulana Shabeer Ahmad Usmaani of Deoband after printing it. Give a clear reply.
>
> 14. Permitted and Prohibited WASEELAH, please explain. Can we give WASEELAH of dead Saints like Deobandis vehemently argue? They even say that it is not only permitted but a blessed thing. Plz comment.
>
> 15. What is your opinion about Maariful Quraan of Mufti Mohammad Shafee of Deoband. This waseelah is also given in it. It being a Deobandi Tafseer. He explains that the religion is midway between the men of God & the book of God. Plz explain.
>
> 16. Are Deobandis Ahl-lus-Sunnah Wal Jamaah or not. Do the Sufis as explained above come in this category or not?
>
> 17. Is it true that the Publisher Fazaail-e-Aamaal has repented on his publishing this book after a telephonic conversation with Saudi Ulema some time back? Give a clear answer.
>
> 18. Did the prophet die a death of the “Status of a Martyr”. The concept of Hayaat-un-Nabee (SAW) needs to be explained here. Is he aware of the condition of his ummah ?
>
> 19. What is the status of Daeef Hadees in Shariah? Can it be taken in Aqaaids and Ibaadat e.g. (Prayer) Salaat or is it totally rejected? Can it be taken as a Daleel (Proof)? Can Daeef Ahadees be taken for fatwa in absence of Saheeh Ahaadees? Please explain e.g. head Cap and Turban weak report, (Ibn-Qayyim). Explain
>
> 20. What is the status of Fabricated, Ahadees?
>
> 21. Can Daeef Ahadees be quoted for Encouraging Muslims and in Character building?
>
> 22. What about the differences amongst Muslims in the method of performing salaat e.g. Hanafee, Shafee, Maliki, Hambli or Ahl-e-Hadees way? Can’t there be a one way of performing it, rather than 5 ways of performing it? What was the maslak of Sahabah (Raa), Tabieen and Taba Tabien.What about the maslak of the four Imams (Abu Hanifa, Shaifee, Maalik and Ahmad bin Hambal (Raa)?
>
> 23. Can Daeef Hadees be called a Sunnah or an order from the Prophet?
>
> 24. Which about the Firqa-e-Naajiyah? The Salafis here say that only the Salafis are the saved sect. and not the Deobandis or Hanafees? Plz explain in detail.
>
> 25. Does one have to give one Azaan one hr. before Jumaah Prayer (just before sermon) and 2nd Azaan just before the Friday Khutbah (Arabic Khutbah).
>
> 26. Were the Sahaabah (RAA) infallible? Can we perform just 2 Rakaats before Friday Prayers on entering the mosque or we have to perform 4 Rakaats. Note that the Ist opinion has the support / proof of Hadees and the 2nd opinion has only the practice of Suhabi (RA) as proof ? Can we take the Hadees in Preference to the way of a Sahabee (RAA).
>
> 27. Triple Divorce in one breath. Is this way of giving Divorce permitted? Some scholars (Deobandis) say it takes effect and consequently thousands of families’ breaks some say it is taken as one divorce instead of three and hence there is room for reconciliation .Please comment. Was Hazrat Umars (RAA) Ijtihad wrong in it?
>
> 28. Some Hanafee fiqh books Hidaayah Durr-e-Mukhtar ,Futhwa-e-Alamgere contain shameful masaails e.g;Hurmat-e-Musaara.etc.Hence, they are very controvercial.Please comment. Is it true that Imam-e-Shaafee(Raa) was killed by a Hanafi Zeolot?
>
> 29. Handshaking is Sunnah. But with one hand or both hands. Some say with one hand is sunnah, some say with both hands is sunnah. Maulana Abdur-Rahman Muhaddis Mubarak(who has written Tuhfa –tul-Ahwazi)has written a research booklet on it and has concluded that one should use into one hand in shaking with another Muslim Brother.
>
> 30. Do Souls of dead persons come back to the earth after death?
>
> 31. Is it sunnah to Perform 2 Rakaats of nafl before Farz of Magrib?If yes why do not the Hanafees allow so much time after Maghrib Azaan? They hardly allow 15 seconds between Azaan of Maghrib and Salat (Farz).
>
> 32. What about different Sufi orders like Qadiriyah, Chistiya, Soharwardiyah, etc? Are they Bidatis?
>
> 33. Quranic verse in surah Nisaa verse 59 concerning Allahs’ order regarding resolution of differences, if they creep amongst muslims?----“Fa rudduu illallaahi wa Rasoolihee”……Dosen’t this order of Allah go in favour of Salafi Manhaj?
>
> 34. Is it sunnah to join feet with feet in prayers Jamaat Salaats. Deobandis say it Bidath and Salafis say it is sunnah Please Reply.
>
> 35. Can we wipe over simple socks? or is it wajib to wipe (Masah) only over leather socks?
>
> 36. Isn’t the Methodology of Muhadditheen better than that of the Fuqahaa?
>
> 37. The book “Heavenly ornaments” of Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi is a very controversial book .What is your opinion?
>
> 38. Can Daeef Ahadees be taken as proof in Fazaail -e- Qur’an (Merits of Different suras in the Quran)?
>
> 39. I have read “As-Salaat-ut-taraaweeh” and Sifat -e-Salaat-un-Nabi”(SAW)of Allamah Nasir-ud-din Albani(RA) Should one change his method of offering salaat in accordance with it and he has also stated that there is absolutely no diference between the salaats of men and women? Is it correct? Please Comment.
>
> 40. What is your opinion about Allanah Ibn –e- Taymiyah (Ra)& research work done by Allamah Nasir-ud-din Albani(Ra)?
>
> 41. What about the knowledge of Hadees of Imaam Abu-Haneefa?Was he Ahl-us-Sunnah or Ahl-ur-Rai? Deobandis say he was a Muhaddith & Salafis say he was poor as regards his Knowledge of Hadees? What if one finds a Saheeh Hadees in opposition to his Mazhab. Should he stick to his Mazhab or take the hadees?
>
>
>
>42. Why is there a wide gulf of differences between Salafis and Hanafees?They are fighting with each other over these differences since last 1000 years.
>
> 43. Are only the Salafis Ahl-us-Sunnah and jamaah (Fira-e- Naajiyah)as they vehemently propagate . Please reply in context of Nasiruddeen Albanis methodology and research work he has conducted?
>
> 44. Is Taqleed a Bidah as Salafis say that it was not practiced for first four centuries after the Prophets (saw) death? And it has broken this ummah into sects &groups. Please Comment.
>
>
>
>45. What about reading books of Sheikh-ul-Islam Ibn –e- Tayimah & Sheikh-ul-Islam Mohammad bin Abdul Wahab (RA) in preference to Scholars of the Sub-continent (Deobandis)
>
> 46. What is the Maslak of Saudi Ulema like Allamah bin Baz (RA)? Are they Salafis or Muqallids---Hambalis / Shaafees or Maalikis? What if they find a Saheeh Hadees and their Maslaks’ ruling is against it (based on a Daeef Hadees or on a Scholars Rai (opinion) ?
>
> 47. Hanafee Ulema here say that Saudi Ulema & masses are Shafee / Hambalee Maliki Muqallids. Is this true? Do the Saudi ulema follow their respective schools of thought even if the opinion of their respective maslaks contradicts or opposes an authentic ( saheeh) hadith. The Hanafi ulema here say that Saudi ulema are also Muqalids ( blind followers) of their respective Madhabs / Schools of thought and hence Taqleed is Wajib on Muslims. Hence everybody in Indian subcontinent should be a Hanafee Muqallid. They label the salafis as Ghair Muqalids and Bidah’tis Please comment.
>
> 48. Please comment clearly on whether one should read the following books of Deobandis :-
>
>
>
>a). Mashaikh-e-Chist
>
>b). Irshaad-ul-Mulook
>
>c). Shariat and Tareeqat
>
>d). Ashrafus Sawaneh/Hiqayaat-e-Auliya by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi
>
>e). Shamaim-e-Imdaadiyah by Imdaadullah Mulaja Makki.
>
>f). Tazkirat-ur-Rasheed by Rasheed Ahamad Gangohi
>
>
> 49. What about the Shajarah of the Soofi Sheikhs, linked to each other by the Pledge (Biah) e.g., Chisti order which is strangely linked up to Hazrat Hassan-e-Basree and ultimately to Hazrat Ali (RAA) and even then called a Chishti order of Tareeqah ? Is this way of giving pledge proven by Sunnah?
>
>
> 50. Allamah Ibn-e-Taymiyah (RA) has issued a Fatawa that every Muslim who has the Aqeeda that Taqleed of one Imaam is wajib inspite of a Saheeh Hadees on any particular Maslah being against the Imaams’ ruling is tentamount to “Shariah Making” and so he or she is a Mushrik (Fatwa Misriyah). Is this true ?
>
>
> 51. Shah Waliullah (RA) Dehlwi has written in his book that Taqleed i Maslaks are a “Bidah” and like Maulana Muhammad Junaaghadi (RA) of India he also says that Muqallids are Bidatis. Please comment in whether these “Muqallid Zealots” being declared as Mushriks and Bidatis by greatest scholars of Muslim Ummah like Ibn- Taymiyah and Ibn-Qayyim and Shah Walliullah (RAA) are hence treading the path to Hell? May Allah save us one and all from Hellfire Ameen!
>
>
> 52. Please comment on the literature published in India by Dar-us-Salafiyyah Bombay and Ahya Call and Guidance Centre Andheri (West) Bombay.
>
> 53. What if a Deobandi Mufti brushes aside many fatawas of Ibn-e-Taymiyah (RA) simply because it is against the Deobandi Fatwa & if he says that Ibn-e-Taymiyah (RA) is alone in giving such Fatwa ?
>
> 54. The lectures of Fazeelatush Sheikh Mehrajudeen Rabbani Shiekh Tauseef Rehmaan Rashidi against Deobandis. Tableeghi Jamaat & Soofis and labeling them as Mushriks and Bidatis.
>
>
>
>Please give a clear and detailed reply to these questions as the guidance of many Muslims is dependent on your reply.
>
>
>Please send me books (English) on :-
>
>
>1 Tawheed / Islamic Creed (especially by Ibni-e-Tayimyah and Dr. Bilaal Philips).
>
>2 CD’s on Fatwa Bin-Baaz and Fatwa Ibn-e-Tayimyah.
>
>3 Islamic literature against Bidah in English &
>
>4 Quranic Tafseer in English (Dr. Taqi-ud-deen Al Halaali) in 9 volumes.
>
>
>
>My Address is:-
>
>Dr. HUMAYUN SHAWL
>S/O MR. MOHAMMAD MUMTAZ SHAWL
>R/O RAJBAGH OPP. SUB POST OFFICE,
>NEAR MINTO CIRCLE SCHOOL, SRINAGAR, KASHMIR,
>PIN CODE: - 190008, INDIA.
>
>
>___________________________________________________
>Click below to experience Sooraj Barjatya's latest offering
>'Main Prem Ki Diwani Hoon' starring Hrithik Roshan,
>Abhishek Bachchan & Kareena Kapoor http://www.mpkdh.com
>